Ensuring Equity and Inclusivity in AI-powered Educational Assessment
A Case Study of Policy and Practice in Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71291/y40x8k18Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Computer-Based Testing, Equity, Inclusivity, Digital Divide, Educational PolicyAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) and computer-based testing (CBT) are increasingly central to educational assessment in Nigeria, promising efficiency, transparency, and fairness. However, concerns about equity and inclusivity persist, especially for rural learners and students with disabilities. This study critically examines how Nigeria’s education policies and practices address fairness in AI-enabled assessment, with particular attention to alignment with international ethical standards. A qualitative desk review was conducted, and policy documents, annual reports, and empirical studies published between 2015-2024 were analysed. Ribble Digital Equity Framework (2012) and UNESCO AI and Education: Guidance for Policymakers (2021) provided the analysis, focusing on access, participation, empowerment, and ethical use. As results reveal, the Nigerian policy texts express general commitments to digital access but do not provide specific mechanisms for the equitable integration of artificial intelligence. Students in rural areas are disproportionately marginalised by infrastructure shortages, such as low internet access and computer illiteracy. Students with disabilities, especially the visually impaired, experience systemic marginalisation because of the uneven distribution of assistive technology, resulting in poorer admission performance. Compared with UNESCO standards, Nigeria’s regulatory frameworks lack algorithmic transparency, non-discrimination, and inclusive design. The paper finds that, although Nigeria's assessment system remains primarily CBT-based, existing disparities in infrastructure, digital literacy, accessibility, and disability accommodation present significant risks for future AI-enabled assessment adoption. The findings suggest that, unless accompanied by deliberate safeguards relating to inclusive design, algorithmic accountability, accessibility, and digital capacity building, future AI-enabled assessment systems may reproduce or amplify existing educational inequalities rather than mitigate them.
References
Abdulkareem, Z., & Lennon, M. (2023). Impact of digital divide on students’ performance in computerised UTME in Nigeria. Information Development, 02666669231191734.
Abubakar, A. S., & Adebayo, F. O. (2014). Using computer based test method for the conduct of examination in Nigeria: Prospects, challenges and strategies. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 47-56.
Agbarakwe, H. A., & Chibueze, O. O. (2024). Leveraging artificial intelligence for enhanced assessment and feedback mechanisms in nigeria higher education system. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(9), 142-151.
Akinola, O. S. (2023, October 26). Exclusion by pity: How JAMB paper-based testing keeps visually impaired candidates digitally behind. TheCable. https://www.thecable.ng/exclusion-by-pity-how-jamb-paper-based-testing-keeps-visually-impaired-candidates-digitally-behind
Alabi, A. O., & Mutula, S. M. (2020). Digital inclusion for visually impaired students through assistive technologies in academic libraries. Library Hi Tech News, 37(2), 14-17.
Baker, R. S. (2023). The Current Trade-off Between Privacy and Equity in Educational Technology. The Economics of Equity in K-12 Education: Necessary Programming, Policy, and Systemic Changes to Improve the Economic Life Chances of American Students, 123-138.
Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2022). Algorithmic bias in education. International journal of artificial intelligence in education, 32(4), 1052-1092.
Bulut, O., Beiting-Parrish, M., Casabianca, J. M., Slater, S. C., Jiao, H., Song, D., & Morilova, P. (2024). The rise of artificial intelligence in educational measurement: Opportunities and ethical challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18900. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.18900
Dahiru, M. (2025). Barriers to Adopting ICT-Based Teaching Methods in Nigerian Polytechnic Institutions. Available at SSRN 5285586.
Danladi, H., & Dodo, A. K. (2019). An assessment of the challenges and prospects of computer based test (CBT) in joint admissions and matriculation board (JAMB). International journals of humanities and social sciences (IJHS).
Eynon, R. (2023). Algorithmic bias and discrimination through digitalisation in education: A socio-technical view. In World Yearbook of Education 2024 (pp. 245-260). Routledge.
Holstein, K., & Doroudi, S. (2021). Equity and artificial intelligence in education: will" aied" amplify or alleviate inequities in education?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.12920.
Ikpefan, F. (2025, April 29). Visually impaired candidates: Minister lauds JAMB for supporting FG’s inclusive education agenda - The Nation Newspaper. The Nation Newspaper. https://thenationonlineng.net/visually-impaired-candidates-minister-lauds-jamb-for-supporting-fgs-inclusive-education-agenda/
Johnson, F. A., & Akindoju, O. G. (2023). Visos an Assistive Computer Based Testing (CBT) in The Examination of the Visually Impaired In Nigeria. IJIRST Digit. Libr, 8, 175-180.
Kayode, A. E. (2019). Examining computer-based technology skill and academic performance of students in Nigerian universities (Doctoral dissertation, Doctoral Thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal. University of KwaZulu-Natal ResearchSpace).
Madaio, M., Blodgett, S. L., Mayfield, E., & Dixon-Román, E. (2022). Beyond “fairness”: Structural (in) justice lenses on ai for education. In The ethics of artificial intelligence in education (pp. 203-239). Routledge.
Ogechukwu, O. F. (2019). Challenges of 2018 Computer-Based Test (CBT) jamb examination for senior secondary school academic performance in Anambra Atate, Nigeria. European Journal of Education Studies.
Ojokheta, K., & Omokhabi, A. A. (2023). Project Initiatives on Inclusive and Equitable Use of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Lessons Derivable for Policy Direction in Nigeria. COUNS-EDU: The International Journal of Counselling and Education, 8(3).
Onyekachi, N. I. (2024). Assessment of Electricity Access and Education Outcomes in Nigerian Universities (Master's thesis, Oslo Metropolitan University).
Ribble, M. (2012). Digital citizenship for educational change. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 48(4), 148-151.
Rottner, R., Porter, L., Bock, J., Jannone, J., Senerchia, R. W., Ward, J., & Whittinghill, J. (2025). AI and the Digital Divide. In Teaching and Learning in the Age of Generative AI (pp. 309-331). Routledge.
Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2022). Equity in online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 192-206.
UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376709
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mary Ifeoluwa Otegbade, Deborah Anuoluwapo Demurin, Babatunde Joseph KOLASHI, (PhD) (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
